Am Samstag, den 18.08.2012, 01:44 -0400 schrieb Mike Frysinger: > On Saturday 18 August 2012 01:16:29 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > > - everything depending on boost (current 1.49 won't work, you need > > 1.50, and quite a few things break with 1.50); > > there's a trivial patch needed to make 1.49 work. forcing people to use 1.50 > is purely the boost's maintainers choice.
I'm already working on some of the boost-1.49/50 breakages and 1.51 is already in the pipeline, so 1.50 has to leave p.mask in a month or so anyway. > > > - everything depending on gnutls (current 2.x version does not build > > with glibc 2.16, and quite a few things don't build with gnutls 3); > > there's a trivial patch long been available that you've refused to merge. so > any errors here are of your choosing. > > > Congrats, this is just the kind of behaviour that makes Gentoo look > > professional... no wait I meant the other way around I guess. Because > > the automake 1.12 breakage is not enough to have in tree, hm? > > *yawn*. don't use unstable if you want stability. > -mike
