On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 03:52:49 -0700 "Gregory M. Turner" <[email protected]> wrote: > Took me a while, but I think I see why this is correct, now (mostly > -- see below). The source of my confusion was a mistaken assumption > that die() would not respect PORTAGE_NONFATAL.
The source of your confusion is more the impression that there is such a thing as PORTAGE_NONFATAL. You should be reading the spec, not code. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
