On 10/20/2012 4:07 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 10/20/2012 03:51 PM, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
Anyhow, given that eclasses can probably avoid auto-die() if they need
to, this leaves the issue of nonfatal allowing die to return to
callers... is there really any reason that die() needs to work this way?
If helpers always used __helpers_die() instead of die(), then couldn't
die() be changed to ignore PORTAGE_NONFATAL?
Yes. It's a bug, as Ciaran said.
For anyone following this discussion, just a note that I've created a
bug for this issue:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=439356
A proposed patch is attached to the bug.
-gmt
