-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/25/2012 10:13 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 20:55:37 +0200 hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> Currently you seem to have focused more on distutils when
>> writing python-r1 which makes this eclass a bit raw. Waiting for
>> other developers to file feature requests instead of figuring out
>> those yourself before they even consider porting their ebuild to
>> your new eclasses seems like a questionable policy to me. They
>> might not be too excited about it to start discussions and 
>> feature requests just to switch from an already working
>> implementation.
> 
> As you may have failed to notice, most of Python packages actually
> are using distutils. Thus, the core goal for distutils-r1/python-r1
> was to correctly support those packages.
> 
> Now that distutils is supported well, I can start thinking about 
> supporting random hackish build systems. I will review redshift
> and give you my thoughts.
> 
> Just note that your attitude is not motivating at all. I haven't
> killed any of your kitten or forced anyone to use python-r1. Most
> of you didn't even care to give a single word of feedback
> throughout the development process, so your position of 'this
> eclass doesn't give me shiny functions I want' is at least
> impolite.
> 

Sorry, I thought the main goal was to deprecate python.eclass at some
(very distant) point.

If that is true, then we need to support _all_ build systems
using/related to python.

I was just trying to say that you shouldn't wait for developers to
point out all these cases. Best way would be to start converting
exotic ebuilds and grep for packages that use python, but _not_ distutils.

Otherwise I am missing the point why you created two eclasses instead
of one (namely just distutils-r1).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQitZQAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzuOEIAJp9siMgIh4mdDP/kMNvCvpw
jOJqML6ZMq9fEl5g8y7D46Vlw3cpQOUErh7fR7iNhN21EZsetNiAfi+s25+cnIWV
XF/zrmdGxGJLqgJLwRI8sWwobCiQWpzQC+wJND6DDyCEk5NsJNMuCfFvgIO3l6YY
Q6Amtn3QRwNGaZdCF6jWnSScqyJIK5x6ih6UVe99tgwPasNzDWxLesyr1LbkW4sB
yohyQGN+JuSWlbOrM9BCs2M5VBFSMlnXTdwJqB4wxEY60FPsFQ33+5Mhx39Wvzd+
oDB+0NpqsVU6SZZ3K2hCr70T5M4j/CFGP1AaX5Z1nYoXxeJRkrat+95lcTCXeo0=
=awW1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to