On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 07:55:38AM +0000, Tony "Chainsaw" Vroon wrote: > On Wed, 2012-12-26 at 22:01 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > > Actually, since ulm pointed out in another thread that the > > council has not mandated that we support separate /usr without an > > initramfs, I am re-considering this. > > So now that the /usr-merge steamroller can not break systems through > udev, because an alternative now exists... another way must be found? > That seems rather immature. > What must be forked next to keep this working? openrc?
Nothing must be forked. No one has said anything is happening yet. This is just a discussion. William
pgpMXyuN3dwx0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
