On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Zac Medico posted on Tue, 08 Jan 2013 23:42:39 -0800 as excerpted: > >> Weren't we planning to drop the CVS keywords for the git migration, >> anyway? > > Are the git migration blockers at such a point that we can get an ETA > yet? Something rough, like are we talking near midyear, late this year > or early next, maybe two years out, or not close enough to even approach > a reasonable guess, yet. > > Because if it's actually looking like this year, then anything like > switching on cvs to serial numbers as mentioned elsewhere, probably isn't > worth the trouble. Let's focus on the git switch and get 'er done!
++ There really isn't that much left - certainly not in comparison to adding serial numbers to ebuilds and building all kinds of logic that relies on them, in which case all of that logic becomes ADDITIONAL blockers on the git migration. It really makes no sense to add more and more logic to the VCS when we're going to be ripping it all out and replacing it. Rich
