On 17/01/2013 15:33, Ben de Groot wrote: > But is there any reason other than "assumption" to stick to foo-bar > category names?
Well I for one have used this before when I wanted to get informative build logs: virtual/ packages have no build logs whatsoever so I don't care to grep for them. It might be incidental but I don't see a compelling reason to break free of it. > One alternative we did come up with is qt-framework, since that is > what upstream also uses (though mostly it's plain Qt), since it's a > collection of libraries and applications. How many packages are we talking about? Especially if you don't want qwt to join there, I assume we're way below 50? If so I would vote nay to any new category at all, to be honest. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
