On 01/02/2013 13:07, Michael Weber wrote: > Making up new situations up like cross-dev, Gentoo/Prefix, or jet > another cluttered C compiler should not doom working software.
Which would be all fine and dandy .... > I agree on your testing effort and practice, but compliance with the > weirdest of all setups shouldn't be ultimate reason. ... if you had a clue on what you were saying. The tinderbox _by design_ is not testing "weirdest of all setups", it's testing baseline. And if nobody's interested in getting (example) media-video/w3cam working (#247917 — last activity on the bug by me on 2010; last activity by someone else in 2008!), I don't see why it should be kept in tree. Bloody hell, I wonder how many people complaining about removing packages are actually using said packages, rather that complaining on principles! -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes [email protected] — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
