On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 23:11:44 -0800 Alec Warner <anta...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> I do not find their stance wholly unreasonable. They offered to point > users at an overlay, if someone was willing to maintain the patches > there (in lieu of user_patches.) The end result is that if users apply > the patches, they will get an unsupported setup. There is a fear as > well, that the patches may damage cards (since the patches are not > supported by the vendor.) We're talking about updating an include path here. Some files moved. I don't think that justifies breaking stable. -- gcc-porting toolchain, wxwidgets learn a language baby, it's that kind of place @ gentoo.org where low card is hunger and high card is taste
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
