On 03/10/2013 07:04 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 12:44:18 +0100
> Tomáš Chvátal <tomas.chva...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> If I remember correctly the damn rule is to put it for 30 days into
>> testing, and as you said there was no previous version on arm so users
>> could've reported some issues, i agree that sometimes you have to
>> ignore the rules to really fix stable, but was this such case for
>> sure?
> 
> I've done straight to stable keywording _many_ times. The rationale is
> that with no previous version stable for a particular architecture,
> there really are no users who could see _regressions_, hence waiting
> the nominal thirty days is meaningless in this case.
> 
> 
>      jer
> 

another note:
I was told a while back (I might still have it in irc logs), that 30
days is NOT a rule. It's common sense, but in the end the maintainer
decides when to request stabilization, no one else.

Blame people if they break something, not if they ignore soft policies.

Reply via email to