On Mar 24, 2013 8:25 PM, "Matt Turner" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Markos Chandras <[email protected]> wrote: > > And what if it breaks again in the future? Should we go over the same > > discussion again? > > Can't this be restated as "Shouldn't we tree clean it now since it > could have bugs in the future?"? Tree cleaning packages over future > hypothetical bugs seems like bad policy. >
Sure but I haven't seen anyone stepping up and fix the existing problems either....
