On 24/03/13 23:12, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Mar 24, 2013 8:51 PM, "Nikos Chantziaras" <rea...@gmail.com <mailto:rea...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On 24/03/13 22:25, Matt Turner wrote: >> >> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Markos Chandras <hwoar...@gentoo.org <mailto:hwoar...@gentoo.org>> wrote: >>> >>> And what if it breaks again in the future? Should we go over the same >>> discussion again? >> >> >> Can't this be restated as "Shouldn't we tree clean it now since it >> could have bugs in the future?"? Tree cleaning packages over future >> hypothetical bugs seems like bad policy. > > > Well, even though I wasn't happy to see tvtime getting tree-cleaned, I understand that Gentoo doesn't work with hired packagers. This isn't Ubuntu or RedHat Linux. Gentoo packagers don't maintain what they're not interested in. > > In the end it's another program that will end up in my ~/bin directory. > > Why? Don't you want to work with me and maintain it together? Why keep it working just for you?
I can do that. Though the current ebuild seems to work just fine. There's no "alsa" USE flag and it builds with automake 1.13.
