-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 06/04/13 11:27 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:



I concurr.  Plus it was decided a couple of months back that everyone
should revbump or version bump when migrating to EAPI5 (if not all
future EAPIs).

The main issue, as I recall, with libpng system updates is that a
regular system-update-and-revdep-rebuild tends to fail because
packages need to be rebuilt during the middle of the system update.
Although this IS manageable even for green end-users with a bit of
hand-holding, ideally we want to avoid it as much as possible.


AFAICT, it's just a matter of timing the migration of rdeps we bump to
EAPI5 and slot-operator deps.  If we wanted to, we could:

1. revbump-and-p.mask ~arch packages, and the unmask them all when
libpng-1.6 is unmasked -- a common, grep'able comment in p.mask could
be used to indicate this list of package atoms.

2. ~arch-keyword a revbump of stable packages, and mass-stabilize when
libpng-1.6 goes stable.  A tracker bug would probably be best for this.

And of course, if the package has an update for other reasons in the
meantime, then they can just hit the tree as per normal and be removed
from the list(s) above.

Thoughts?


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EAREIAAYFAlFiEJIACgkQ2ugaI38ACPCmWAD/UPXBQd0JwmK++UeZKfbaUK6w
tBkv+9sGVkQoJ3rGMfwA/ivRzMbrKJFoLH7TAsi0lGvIL4AQrgkVVv02oFKgRpaP
=u0Qx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to