-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 03 May 2013 22:58:57 -0400 "Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Note that PMS says USE_EXPAND variables are supposed to be treated > > as incremental. Also note that portage implements pseudo-increment > > behavior for settings of USE_EXPAND variables in profile > > make.defaults, but it only works for positive values (which are > > stacked incrementally only after they have been translated to the > > corresponding USE flags). > > > That is a bit of an issue honestly, but a rare time when I'd say we > should make PMS match portage behavior.
Uhm, PMS governs how this works for profiles, not for user configuration or any crazy stuff you do on the command line. Portage is not required to use exactly the same code for both... - -- Ciaran McCreesh -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlGFKboACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHoEgCg27zs7DoujKY4jXkx4ZXv2j6X Qu4AoNrGtxLJbiNpCkwyd9J36kWGMf2S =MfPG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
