-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/04/2013 11:31 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 03 May 2013 22:58:57 -0400 > "Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Note that PMS says USE_EXPAND variables are supposed to be treated >>> as incremental. Also note that portage implements pseudo-increment >>> behavior for settings of USE_EXPAND variables in profile >>> make.defaults, but it only works for positive values (which are >>> stacked incrementally only after they have been translated to the >>> corresponding USE flags). >>> >> That is a bit of an issue honestly, but a rare time when I'd say we >> should make PMS match portage behavior. > > Uhm, PMS governs how this works for profiles, not for user > configuration or any crazy stuff you do on the command line. Portage is > not required to use exactly the same code for both... > > Thanks for clearing that up Ciaran. That certainly makes a difference.
- -Zero -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRhTk1AAoJEKXdFCfdEflK2o4QAILB7VhsnktsW7KQC5Y7F/0q fyq1K9q5lg9Fz/2WWZ+yVsjE6XSzLAPjes6kJzez0wZ0BUaDuI7eQOefFFqZ5Lwq P0CdqXdnou3TfaSWmC8s3vVSDX1xV/O2y+9R/zd4YaVFa7vLzVAkFpNNRtzgwGcm o8w5L+Lso1odhLzhsz2Wql5F1L8mNPpV4bAa27XnENrx/BEkRuEJHoj90ZpqPTIv zxMircMWYSnfauhUV4KSe6ieOeUeY7rOKVPMgoqTF0hYR0Oox7Vg5HZx77yy4uQw fkczatmzIp6L/I/zQws7Gi9bgh9wsfwd/jscfH5+8bFTH914YPbs2BejC9HKrnUQ uNN2/jCwlrchlWKWkwxTW/ay2gufsymR8btR3099zupwjCgEpgRDYCkEGS5hqN0V It5Nm7QWHrtBAZJRg/U4Pe/zV8fwYCWKEgreXEZzB5lT+vFkgn7kf/cJkmpOBwvG QR1LAlvnWaRNV0fbaoZydcjDPVZc/yBs1h3J+YOKvKZtF+dkH5/uHbjJPydgtpl4 qG+r2KdtV9aOTbJuidTh97gzAOOkEEbLoKIyqwHvrEzzb93fawVj1IaowUwHBlTq Yutbcbw2W4po5tg1nDy416sZRD2pAgsut47vnRVMUhPlkZn4PBYFYkOVzYAOPwMu PFR2Za+sLwsMYnOshi5W =BkWW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
