-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 08/05/13 12:06 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Ben de Groot <yng...@gentoo.org> > wrote: >> On 8 May 2013 23:39, Fabio Erculiani <lx...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Ben de Groot >>> <yng...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> >>> This sounds really wrong (tm) to me. It took me two weeks to >>> kill that silly systemd-units pkg. All the distros around here >>> do install systemd units with their packages and I believe that >>> the council has already spoken about this. >> >> It sounds more wrong to me to be asking normal package >> maintainers to test and maintain unit files, while they don't use >> systemd themselves, nor have it installed. Nor would most of our >> users need this. > > I don't think we are actually asking you to test/maintain them; > you can treat them as a request for permission to perform a > non-maintainer commit. > > If users run into problems, please feel free to copy/assign us on > bugs.
This could work; although such a thing implies a bit of a different dynamic than i've seen occurring with anything else... So to be clear, the proposal here is that systemd team/herd would be CC'd on all systemd related bugs and handle all non-upstream systemd unit files? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlGKfoQACgkQ2ugaI38ACPASKgD/TjIEK3QBUjq9ONA7dX/x7xRK 1iRXVlYX9R8OTuX62twBAKgw7L5CaKX1agiPY2Zhu0jvf3x1Ag6kYy8o4wrcnHax =N6Uk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
