Am Mittwoch, 22. Mai 2013, 01:43:15 schrieb Thomas Sachau: > > Who said, that bugmail is ignored? Repeating myself, it may be > accidently deleted by the dev or some software (hint: spam filters), it > may actually even be ignored to re-use the bug later. Since i dont > remember even seing a hint for the "will stable in 30 days without > objection", the arch addition is even more a bad surprise for a maintainer. >
Yep. Sounds like this is another case of "maintainer does not read -dev ml, pops up half a year after policies become active, and starts complaining". Come on, I also have a hard time with this list. However, I'm at least skimming the thread titles. (And for stuff like "OMG systemd killed my kittens" my mail client has a nice "ignore thread" feature.) -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer dilfri...@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
