On Sun, 26 May 2013 09:22:05 +0200 Tiziano Müller <dev-z...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 25.05.2013, 15:53 -0400 schrieb Anthony G. Basile: > > We are moving too quickly on bug #448882 ([Tracker] packages not > > providing systemd units). We should come to better consensus on systemd > > integration and we were getting there with the idea of INSTALL_MASK. I > > don't know that it is a working solution yet. I have to oppose adding > > unit files unless we have a way to opt out for reasons I gave earlier, > > regarding embedded systems where one needs to conserve space > > aggressively. And we may have found a way to do so without cluttering > > ebuilds with USE flags. > > Even though I don't care about a couple of files more on my FS I would > prefer to find a solution with functions provided by PMS, not portage > alone. PMS doesn't cover configuration, and I feel this is mostly a configuration problem. > > Can I ask the systemd people to design a working solution for opting > > out? I can't support this initiative without such a solution and I > > would be happy to work with the systemd people to reach it, ie I'll test. > > > > Maybe we have to find a more generic solution for this, because there is > bug #235944 [1] which request extra config snippets for rsyslog added to > various packages. Or is this something different? If yes, how? Well, I don't know rsyslog and I have no real idea where those files end up. But if they end up in a common directory, it's exactly the kind of thing we can handle with INSTALL_MASK. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
