On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Michael Weber <x...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 06/19/2013 06:23 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> I'm all for having fun, but I think the intent was to keep the >> multilib-build eclass usage to a minimum. > Sorry, I've missed that agreement, can you point me to it, please? >
Just something I picked up from various IRC conversations with mgorny and pals. More precisely, I should say it was the eclass author's intent, and it is a principle with which I personally agree. > Turning abi_x86_32 on/off in a global scale is a decision to be made by > the user. With all consequences (initial compile time vs recompiles on > reconsiderations). It doesn't make that difference if turned off. > But if needed, it's just there. > It's a good point. As long as we are willing to support users who do not enable it globally, I guess it is fine.
