On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 01:50:02PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: > On 06/21/2013 01:26 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Thanks for the explanation. But I think that, currently, the only > > remaining "objection" is whether play with /sbin/init (that needs > > sysvinit to be changed if I don't misremember) or with /sbin/einit. > > Looks like mgorny has shown some problems on relying on "einit" instead > > of plain "init" regarding to fallback :/ > > I prefer having /sbin/init used for the pivot since /sbin/einit is a bit > more brittle and as Fabio did the whole machinery is _still_ opt-in.
No, he has his own versions of the systemd and sysvinit ebuilds which move some of the installation to non-standard places as part of this machinery, so it is not opt-in. Also, there was an email on this thread showing that using init=/sbin/einit works, so I'm not seeing what mgorny's objections are. William
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
