On 06/22/2013 01:23 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > and nobody is forced to install eselect-init
That was already demanded earlier in this discussion, but I don't see any response from the initiators of this idea (possible I just missed it). Anyway... if they do such a global change without discussing this particular problem, then it will cause someone to revert it or ask for QA/council intervention.
