On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Peter Stuge <pe...@stuge.se> wrote: > Matt Turner wrote: >> >> And? Two wrongs don't make a right. >> > >> > What do you mean by "And?" - it doesn't make much sense as a reply. :\ >> >> He means that none of those provide justification. > > It seemed that the main argument was that there are too few packages > and then then I do think that other categories with few(er!) packages > provide lots of justification.
I think it is a data point. However, decisions need to make sense on their own, not merely in the sense that they're similar to past decisions. I think continuity has some value, but not on its own. In any case, I consider a small number of packages in a category as a warning that something is probably wrong, not really an end-reason for rejecting a course of action. If the category is just immature and likely to grow then a small number of packages isn't a big deal. If the number is small because the category isn't well-defined or adds little value, then that is a reason to stop. Rich
