On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:08 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Le dimanche 11 août 2013 à 22:09 +0300, Alon Bar-Lev a écrit : >>> On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Tom Wijsman <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 13:29:16 -0500 >>> > William Hubbs <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> >> You may ask why I have offered patches instead of just fixing the >>> >> ebuild since I am a team member. That is because even team members >>> >> aren't allowed to touch bugs assigned to [email protected] [1], >>> > >>> > Well, if there are conflicts within a team then I can agree that no >>> > member is allowed to touch the bug without a collaborative decision; >>> > but from what it appears this bug has been handed in a way that one >>> > member appears to take all decisions and the other member has nothing >>> > to say. In particular, comments 5 and 11 change the state of the bug >>> > without giving any reasoning about why that change in state was made; >>> > this is unacceptable, it gives us no reason to believe the state change. >>> >>> This is expected, as it is similar to how systemd/gnome is managed :) >> >> I hope you are not talking about the Gentoo Gnome team as this would be >> very wrong. Every team member is heard on the team. > > I was talking about the designated upstreams. > > Regards, > Alon >
In the future: don't. You've added nothing of substance to this thread, except three additional emails.
