On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina <[email protected]> wrote: > > If upstream doesn't support something it's not a regression. This > upstream removes features all the time in the name of progress. Either > get on the train or get run over by it. If /usr isn't mounted at boot > then systemd team doesn't what your system to boot, so either don't run > systemd or catch up with the rest of the world and learn what an > initramfs is.
We should be introducing those changes in a way friendly to our users (ie warnings, docs, news, etc before going stable, or even testing in extreme cases). But yes, I don't see a problem with letting systemd do the systemd thing. The intent of the council meeting was to even allow longstanding Gentoo projects like udev to go this route as well, once we're sure everything is in place (no specific timeline was set, but seems likely in the next few months as long as docs/etc get updated). The systemd project can manage systemd as it sees fit, but it should not be constrained by QA issues over what goes in /usr vs /. Rich
