On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 15:33:21 +0200 Alex Legler <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 16.09.2013 15:19, Rich Freeman wrote: > > Additionally, can anybody who knows more about bugzilla comment on > > how easy it would be to have some way to mark modifications as > > trivial, and take this into account in the bugspam? Either make it > > configurable as to whether users get trivial bugspam (ideally), or > > at least stick something in the headers that can be filtered on. > > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email allows pretty > fine-grained control over what email you receive. It seems to miss a row for summary changes, which I assume is covered under "Any field not mentioning above changes"; since I think that that includes much other things that one maybe might want to receive, and I don't know how easy it is to change userprefs.cgi to adapt that so I looked at the mail header and think we can have our procmail check for: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc Now the only trick lies in defining a recipe that deems whether the change was trivial or not; thinking about it, it doesn't seem too simple for people that want to receive non trivial summary changes. I think that would require the editor to denote it is trivial or not. -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : [email protected] GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
