-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/02/2013 06:43 PM, yac wrote: >> So if you're relying on the presence of filed bugs to give some >> sort of coverage metric, you're going to be out of luck from time >> to time. For instance, that fun bug where stabilising a version >> of libraw broke the things depending upon it that were already >> stable. >> >> Its ironic really, thats essentially a hidden bug that exists as >> a result of having two tiers of testing. >> >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458516 >> >> I've been long wishing there was a FEATURE I could turn on that >> would just report installs to a database somewhere, showing >> success/fail/succcess+tests/fail+tests , with dependencies, >> useflags, and other relevant context, so you'd at least have a >> dataset of *success* rates, and you could do more heavy testing >> on things where there were fail results, or an absense of >> results. > > +1 >
yo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSTFimAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzzqIH/2Sfn7fbNGmZxGWKDRKNPowQ 7FyUeMWtjZ/ghL9J7erp9f293QBh2iLzgsVGqij1++LPul6BAYaAqX3HcktB3zNJ 8AEjLh9ied1497EtXiCrQGmL35dg2kyvtnxfp8/OAxz80CaJKO+TQoGBnn8gjBQF 1kzeIJ02aWuU40143B0pQ2dS8vjD0tYViWxy6QQr7YUdAChtkSsbchnVUA0oqnX4 fQXXA1pfwyDqKpKereDM5PqrGWumhXhaEwEzoSUCm7ozIW0mtFxdMhBabFWcJFMK lcTNWKyMfRCzoWsAu31jSC/nYMyIDFnS1VCQCk10pb6rFVkEpaQtW1MSyjRdBkI= =/IqK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
