-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/30/2013 01:45 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > hasufell schrieb: >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464536 >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470554 >> >> for the first bug: net-libs/ortp media-libs/mediastreamer and >> net-voip/linphone are from the same upstream and actually have to >> be bumped and stabilized TOGETHER, because it is very likely that >> they break otherwise. And that's exactly what happened. The >> maintainer was probably aware of it, but didn't respond, so arch >> testers went ahead and did not test reverse deps. > > I already replied in the second bug but let me reiterate again. > What I wrote in October 2012 to this list[1] is basically still > true. > > Following retirements, there is nobody in voip team who is > interested in these packages any more. Nobody in voip requested > that these packages go stable. When I read bugzilla reports that > version bumps (typically done as drive-by commits by outside > developers) break consumers, then I sometimes update the > dependencies to account for that. When I saw the second > stabilization bug, I added the blocker, but the stabilization > proceeded anyway due to technical issues with the robo-stable > scripts. > > The ffmpeg-1.0 (and libav-9) situation got especially bad. For > example, a ptlib ebuild was committed which introduced libav-9 > compatibility, but also broke *every* *single* *consumer* of the > package[2]! I have only little time to dedicate to voip packages, > and cleaning up the mess that other developers leave is not a good > way to use this time. > >> To me it seems one relies on the other to handle this and in the >> end no one does? > > We have one user, Andrew Savchenko, who expressed interest to > proxy maintain linphone and its dependencies via the voip overlay. > I have offered to commit the ebuilds for him to g-x86. > Unfortunately it was a lengthy process to allow him access to the > overlay but that was cleared 10 days ago. > > Once he starts pushing new ebuilds to the overlay, I will add him > as proxy maintainer in metadata.xml. > > > Best regards, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn > > > [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/80638 [2] > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=474742 > >
Yeah... I mean, I noticed. And this isn't critique to the team for the packages being outdated. No bump is better than a shitty bump imo. However... the fact still stands: arch team did not realize that it breaks linphone. It could have been discussed on that bug how to proceed because of the severity of the ffmpeg situation. But there was no discussion and it broke a package in stable arch 3 months ago or so and is unresolved til now. That's not the way we should do things. If we know this is going to happen we have to do something and in the worst case that is dropping back to ~arch, tree-cleaning or hardmasking. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSSWd8AAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzBwsH/RNPbDqHwi3zO685i+3BIoYn T2u6JpdMeXdyco1UaYcTxZcp46oHjP40XG6wNWv73O+EydtwxR2Gl5Z/3VS1liXx QdQ2eBLR0R5aqFYJYzX6vj2iEDypeMoz7ka/0CiaS/uL1ygrEkJ2GB1X4TE/td8p 58OjsD0T8+wo3OZphUu+tyALI2v3AS9J60U9DEv9nTZ55kWVHVpmClxDJudgHmFv RriqcViFapFf54fnVXtOUzw8l7to5+bhiSM4Ne5cRvfu+cdn06w7p4iMEIiwshYS OHUqG3K5peDW6BiO/T8Vg1hZuc/BMtDrg9Z8mj8vvZIC4axaesfKRUtykgijXUc= =fuyE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
