Andreas K. Huettel <[email protected]> wrote: > Am Freitag, 15. November 2013, 21:18:03 schrieb Martin Vaeth: > >> If this is not very hard to implement in portage, I would >> strongly vote to remove this implicit connection: > > Not really doable since this is explicitly defined as such in EAPI=5 PMS. > > Retroactively changing PMS is probably not a good idea.
So keeping PMS is more important than usability? Great! One must know where to put emphasis and keep an unfortunate chosen detail forever (or, as experience concerning EAPI upgrades shows, at least for decades) in order to fulfill a nonsense bureoucracy which probably at most 3 packages use, currently. Certainly, this is more important than user experience!
