On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 04:02:27PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2014-01-17, o godz. 14:02:51 > [email protected] napisał(a): > > > Maybe, a good solution is to introduce a special arch, "noarch", for such > > packages (similar to what's done in the rpm world). Then, if a package is > > ~noarch, it is automatically considered ~arch for all arches. Similar for > > stable. The maintainer should be able to keyword ~noarch and to stabilize > > noarch. Comments? > > If you want to play with such a major change, you should start a new > thread instead of starting it in the middle of this spam-art. > Otherwise, many people will miss it and complain loudly afterwards.
I am going to agree with mgorny on this; highjacking this thread with this change is not appropriate; all we were doing in this thread is trying to figure out a way to improve our stabilization policy. Introducing a "noarch" keyword should be discussed in a completely separate thread. William
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
