On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 21:15:47 -0600
Steev Klimaszewski <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 02:48 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 19:35:22 -0600
> > Steev Klimaszewski <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > > Alright, well, I've tried my best, I give up.  Instead of having
> > > something working we should just remove ebuilds of working
> > > packages.
> > 
> > s/should/could/ s/ebuilds/stable keyword or last stable version/
> > 
> > It is at the maintainer's discretion; and such decision is to make
> > it possible for a maintainer to move on when he or she can no longer
> > guarantee a working ebuild, to stop being progress-blocked by it.
> > 
> 
> You know what - this is pure and utter bullshit.

Why is this pure and utter bullshit?

> Keeping it around for "slower" arches does NOT block progress.

Why is keeping it around for "slower" arches not blocking progress?

> I have intimate knowledge with what ACTUALLY happens when people pull
> this bullshit - and that is a system that I can no longer actually
> work on.

That is also what happens when a maintainer keeps around old versions,
as well as old bugs and support for those old versions; as by doing so,
the attention towards newer versions is lost which causes much huger
breakage than the one you have just brought up. Manpower is limited.

> And instead of working towards a fix that actually works
> for people who are ACTUALLY affected by the shitty policy, you hide
> behind definitions and pedantry.  

Why do you think this about the current and/or suggested solution(s)?

> I'm now going to take a break from Gentoo development because this
> thread has seriously caused my blood to boil based on comments from
> the peanut gallery (you) where things don't actually affect your day
> to day work, but your actions do affect mine.

Why? How and why are your actions affected by the QA team's actions?

-- 
With kind regards,

Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer

E-mail address  : [email protected]
GPG Public Key  : 6D34E57D
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2  ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D

Reply via email to