On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 01:48:38AM +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 17:05:08 -0500 > "Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Yes, making the newest versions never available because the old > > > versions sink all your time really stops progress to a dead halt. > > > > > > > Your logic isn't flawed here, it's entirely missing. If version Y is > > stable on all arches but one, and that version is still using version > > X that doesn't affect any of the other arches at all. > > Can this be proven? Why are maintainers like WilliamH upset about this? > > Reference: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/90063
I was mostly upset because of the appearance of inaction by the arch teams. In my specific case, it wasn't the arm guys I was talking about [1]. arm was stable within the first month of adding to the bug. I was very concerned because of how long this bug sat in the stable queue with no action being taken, especially since other important packages depended on it. William [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.dgi?id=487332
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
