-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Toralf Förster:
> On 03/29/2014 08:12 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>> On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 07:15:14 -0400 Alex Xu <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
> 
>>> On 29/03/14 06:07 AM, Toralf Förster wrote:
>>>> WRT to but 504616 I'd like to address my questions made in 
>>>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=504616#c6 to this
>>>> list again :
>>>> 
>>>> "Since the Debian debakel with "fixing" an uninitialized 
>>>> memeory I'm very skeptical to distribution specific 
>>>> corrections which are not included upstream. At least I'm 
>>>> wondering if the USE flag hpn should be enabled by the user 
>>>> explicitely - currently it is in  IUSE already."
>>> 
>>> 1. Please use a spelling checker.
>>> 
>>> 2. IUSE doesn't mean what you think it means. 
>>> http://devmanual.gentoo.org/quickstart/#ebuild-with-use-flags
> 
>> Toralf wants to indicate that it is implicitly enabled by
>> default (by the '+' character); and thus, he would like to see it
>> become disabled by default, such that the user can explicitly
>> enable it.
> 
> Yes - that's what I want.

We have had those debates whether the "+" should follow upstream
decisions and such. Short answer: the maintainer decides. There is no
consistency for this and there will never be.

> 
> At least an einfo should be added to the package IMO telling the
> user that HPN is enabled by default.
> 

No, that's not the right approach. There are tools you can use to
check what flags are enabled. Use 'eix' and 'equery' for example.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=GVHS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to