-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 03/31/2014 01:15 PM, Alex Xu wrote: > On 31/03/14 03:36 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >> So, I'm interested... How widely used is the HPN patch set? Are there >> any good indications that it doesn't negatively impact security? > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=292932 > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693424 > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2007-July/105570.html > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openssh-hpn/ > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/162253 >
Those bug reports are good arguments to have HPN as a feature in openssh. And most of them now many years old and still open. That's an argument to rethink if HPN should be activated quietly. - -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print:1A37 6F99 4A9D 026F 13E2 4DCF C4EA CDDE 0076 E94E -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlM5p3QACgkQxOrN3gB26U6MqAD/RYVZv8On17mFPrVW324H7DxT pkhSnIOCr/WEn1OaLaQA/3F4zjXdCvV0i7R56KeVunef/Wb7o68yHi9EBmKnfrZn =NdCj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----