-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Samuli Suominen: > > > The same GLEP says, > > "In the case of disagreement among QA members the majority of > established QA members must agree with the action. Some examples > of disagreements are whether the perceived problem violates the > policy or whether the solution makes the situation worse." > > While other QA members said masking them at the point you masked > them was already too late for any masking. Thus, majority is > required here and majority is gained by a vote. You are not the > sole authority of QA, which I'm extremely happy of. >
Seems there is a serious communication or authority problem in QA team then. And this is going to get worse if people don't trust them. Currently it looks more like a loose club, instead of a team with strong hierarchical structure, which is the only thing that enables a quick line of action if needed. And that is one of its purposes, afaiu. I'm not saying this because I find it funny, but because I think it needs improvement. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJTOq/OXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzMDlCNDQ4NjEyNDI4NjA5REVEMDI3MzIy MjBDRDFDNUJERUVEMDIwAAoJECIM0cW97tAg3pkP/2jFbh7zswmwfXS7O1V1aFCN U3yDAx8UslkynzxCquHtI5gHoor1i1IO9E1ggfdJdZMbls8U6FknlyOU/1ZFkFHT Gq8LZvQ9jn8uF4mY0vnygosxElYOuZ79Cl1S1wwauWzCz1VRdUZOL+IA57TA+Oj8 j9xT2M8hlYzrKRqMWGLCDXpwOy0uDTXFVossK+06MRM2gMU41lmO4SPFHLDu6MQA MHpfnmapDf5gqDWCuNNDnj/XA240qNFSGT0Z5Qo2KVoZvrFOVzWYXKAoI5pTKRzL upicwygQ88CGB+rL7xpfD+AgjRxH31qhSDP1a8+9iNHa+LNn/Jw28ITBbr7t8mjr UTJ0qtaFZ5jbO2RcyoKV3FkQnUwEcT/4pHrJXydFS2M+2DJX7tXK2H2b+ayXOCpF YsicGQYfxLQU0Bkn+b+wswcmIqeD/aqv3lNN54N5Faea47AeTr5KfpbQNm5NVLOA u2MA7qMCyXUhLS/WtHd0bFSBTnZAQoW8Vc2KmuZ5vT6yBwNsu0KOpA/OIPFbRUur qdTNOpV59ePlgvuMYpvmp03iOhWDx+We9+QbJENO6m2c5/kMpsqdImViJ0253r3d a0JzmZVF53+oe3Y6x+6aDsh9JVzt7dilpska+REiDOXum+0D2wvcJYGrFcodQTM1 JNobhbbHvXoo37rSg5L4 =+Go7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
