Dnia 2014-04-01, o godz. 11:49:37 Ian Stakenvicius <[email protected]> napisał(a):
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 01/04/14 07:26 AM, Duncan wrote: > > Altho I'm ~arch so stable masks won't directly affect me, but at > > the same time, I'm no-multilib, so all those --newuse and -rX-bump > > rebuilds really ARE useless rebuilds of the /exact/ same thing! > > While my system is fast enough it's not a big deal here, it's still > > a pain tracking all those -rX bumps to see what justifies the bump > > (at least I can tell simple USE flag changes on sight), and I hurt > > for those with slower systems! > > OK, on no-multilib profiles, all of this stuff should be USE-masked > anyhow -- so far as I know, you can't even build the abi_x86_32 side > pf a package if your toolchain wasn't USE=multilib to begin with, can you? No-no-no. abi_x86_64 designating the native ABI should be there and binary packages can use it in dependencies. Which pretty much makes me think we oughtn't mask all the flags. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
