On Tue, 1 Apr 2014 20:58:30 -0400 Rich Freeman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Patrick Lauer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Now let's just continue to ignore the existing multilib-portage > > work so we can claim it's irrelevant, while shifting the conditions > > for accepting it whenever it is convenient, while silently adding > > the competing method in-tree so it's all decided now anyway ... > > Conditions for accepting it? What are those, and how have they > changed?
The conditions have always been "someone has to be able to explain exactly what the changes are"... -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
