On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Duncan <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, but... I think stable keywords on such archs must be used > differently, and by virtue of necessity, mean something else than they > mean on more mainstream archs.
This was basically the gist of the Council meeting that discussed this issue. The arch is not stable, thus maintainers are not restricted from dropping the last stable version. The arch team is still welcome to mark things stable if they wish, and if they do so it is up to them to work with their users to define what this means and (ideally) document it. The Council decided not to interfere with the stable keywording, since the arch team felt it useful. Maintainers just need not pay it any attention. Rich
