On 22/07/14 11:21, Michael Palimaka wrote: > On 07/22/2014 07:52 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: >> To sum up: My vote is disable dynamic-deps. And I would be happy to >> apply a patch that does this with the information I have today. > What a great way to kill the distro. > > I can already heat my house with the number of unnecessary rebuilds - I > can't imagine how many people will be left once we have to needlessly > rebuild libreoffice and half the tree every time someone makes some > minor change. If developers can't revbump correctly to address the > shortcomings of dynamic deps, why do we expect they will be able to do > so for static deps? > > When can we expect this issue to be brought before the Council? I look > forward to seeing the specific examples of unavoidable breakage that > would be required to make such a decision. > >
+1
