On 07/26/14 09:28, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 14:55 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel escribió:
Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2014, 13:56:02 schrieb Pacho Ramos:
I guess we will need to wait for the next Council to officially decide
to do this as it will be a big change for ppc* users :/ (I remember
their action was needed for the move to testing of some arches and the
"package-by-package" proposal for others)
Also, I am not sure if any other arch teams (sparc, ia64?) would want to
get this policy too :| (I got ppc* because this concrete case ;))
At first this is an arch team decision. No need for the council.
(Given that in this case there is a responsive and addressable arch team...)
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
[email protected]
http://www.akhuettel.de/
The problem is that blueness looks to be the only member currently
replying :/, I have checked their page and I see no team lead or
similar. Then, I am not sure how to get the ok to proceed or not :| (to
prevent this from getting stalled and we keep trying stabilizing all the
things).
I remember from older thread (one related with udev stabilization), that
blueness was also the only one replying.
Yeah, not having a clear lead is a problem. No one wants to just make a
big decision on behalf of the team without making sure everyone is on
board. Pacho, do you have access to timberdoodle? If so, join both
teams and just take the initiative and let any other "claimants" step
forward now. BTW, taking the lead doesn't mean doing all the work
yourself. I want to see ppc/ppc64 in good shape. I'll be happy to
write scripts to do the demoting to ~ etc etc.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail : [email protected]
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
