El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 09:37 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió: > On 07/26/14 09:28, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 14:55 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel escribió: > >> Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2014, 13:56:02 schrieb Pacho Ramos: > >> > >>> I guess we will need to wait for the next Council to officially decide > >>> to do this as it will be a big change for ppc* users :/ (I remember > >>> their action was needed for the move to testing of some arches and the > >>> "package-by-package" proposal for others) > >>> > >>> Also, I am not sure if any other arch teams (sparc, ia64?) would want to > >>> get this policy too :| (I got ppc* because this concrete case ;)) > >> At first this is an arch team decision. No need for the council. > >> > >> (Given that in this case there is a responsive and addressable arch > >> team...) > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Andreas K. Huettel > >> Gentoo Linux developer > >> [email protected] > >> http://www.akhuettel.de/ > >> > > The problem is that blueness looks to be the only member currently > > replying :/, I have checked their page and I see no team lead or > > similar. Then, I am not sure how to get the ok to proceed or not :| (to > > prevent this from getting stalled and we keep trying stabilizing all the > > things). > > > > I remember from older thread (one related with udev stabilization), that > > blueness was also the only one replying. > > > > > > Yeah, not having a clear lead is a problem. No one wants to just make a > big decision on behalf of the team without making sure everyone is on > board. Pacho, do you have access to timberdoodle? If so, join both > teams and just take the initiative and let any other "claimants" step > forward now. BTW, taking the lead doesn't mean doing all the work > yourself. I want to see ppc/ppc64 in good shape. I'll be happy to > write scripts to do the demoting to ~ etc etc. >
I don't even know about timberdoodle :( I forwarded the mail to both alias (as I forgot first time), then, hopefully they will review it :/ Will CC them again to this just now with this link to allow all to read the full thread: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/92151
