Dnia 2014-07-26, o godz. 15:01:46 Martin Vaeth <[email protected]> napisał(a):
> Ciaran McCreesh <[email protected]> wrote: > > Martin Vaeth <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The idea is to act "as usual", just to skip unnecessary phases... > > > > So someone adds optional selinux support to a package, and then you end > > up with selinux being "on", despite not having it, and then another > > package depends upon your package with [selinux], and the dependency is > > mistakenly treated as met... > > If the developer has added IUSE=selinux and bumps from -r1 to -r1.1, > he has of course verified that this USE-change does not require > recompilation either way, since otherwise he would not have been > allowed to explicitly say the package manager that recompilation > is unnecessary. > So the dependency is *correctly* treated as met. Excuse me but are we talking about updating *DEPEND or IUSE? -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
