On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Maxim Koltsov <maksbo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > For the record: I /think/ that an eclass for packages supporting both qt4 > and qt5 (using multibuild.eclass) /might/ be useful. Looking forward to > hearing Qt team opinion.
Maybe. But you'll have to convince me. We aren't planning on writing the qt5 equivalent of qt4-r2.eclass; qmake-utils.eclass should suffice. Therefore I don't see much usefulness in a "glue" eclass such as the one you're proposing. In any case, this is completely off-topic. Please start a separate discussion or open a bug. Thanks, Pesa
