On 28/08/14 18:58, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2014-08-28, o godz. 00:37:48 > Michał Górny <[email protected]> napisał(a): > >> 3. ulm wants to reintroduce dohtml in an eclass for people who want to >> use it. I'd rather cover it with warnings signs and tell people not to >> touch it. IMHO a better replacement is the plain 'docinto html; dodoc >> -r ...', possibly with some extra filtering applied before or after >> install. >> >> What do you think? > One more thing came up on IRC: einstalldocs (and therefore the default > install function) installing README* that catches README.html as well. > I'd rather not add more dohtml-like magic and say it's fine.
I really dislike the whole default list of files defined for DOCS, I keep constantly adding empty DOCS="" to ebuilds to skip them I'd rather see whole list pruned empty, and let the maintainer decide which docs are actually useful
