Dnia 2014-09-10, o godz. 07:53:31 Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > Personally I would vote for simply have a <maintainer> tag pointing to > > the alias but we would still need to keep a list of real maintainers for > > that alias as usually not all people listed in the alias are willing to > > maintain the packages. > > > > I think the solution to this is that maintainers can be either: > 1. Devs - identified by their email address. (simple enough) > or > 2. Projects - identified by their email alias. > or > 3. A proxy maintainer identified by email address (in which case > either a dev or project must also be listed, potentially including the > proxy maintainer project). 4. A mail alias that is not project :). For example, we have clang@ for easily aggregating all clang-related build failures and other bugs but it isn't a formal team. It's hard if such a thing has proper member list. But in any case, is there a reason for needing to have definitive member list? -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
