On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Maybe one option would be to kill Changelogs and provide a script to let > people get git messages and reformat them in a way similar as current > ChangeLog files, that way people will still be able to save this > information for the future (if they won't have internet conection later > for example) and read it simply with "less" for example. With this > option, we won't need to provide Changelogs and distribute them but > people wanting to have them will still be able to generate them if > wanted (for example, just after updating portage tree)
Or they could just clone the git tree, and they can look at per-file logs anytime they want to. I mean, sure, we COULD do this stuff. But, why? It isn't like kernel.org has some tool that lets kernel users generate per-file changelog histories just in case they don't want to use git. If somebody wants to build a tool like this by all means go ahead and do it. I just don't see it as something that should be a migration pre-requisite. That's just my opinion though. -- Rich