Dnia 2015-01-26, o godz. 12:57:36 Alexis Ballier <[email protected]> napisał(a):
> On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:19:19 -0800 > Zac Medico <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > what Michał claims is that 'foo' will want ffmpeg, no matter what. > > > > Maybe he's talking about some case where portage failed to trigger a > > rebuild when appropriate. We've had a number of bugs like this that > > have been fixed. The most recent recent example is bug 531656 [1]. > > Yes I know about this one :) To be honest I find it much more > difficult and convoluted (?) than the present case, yet you fixed it. > Even worse: there has been tree-wide changes made because of this > (removal of := from all || ( ffmpeg:= libav:= )) instead of filling > portage bugs... which I consider just plain wrong and was in fact my > initial rant. This was done after contacting the PMS team, and I think Portage team as well but not sure anymore. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
pgpNLv2mwC0tX.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
