-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 03/14/2015 11:34 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > imho, > >> Questions: 0. What names for the tree/repository. > > "gentoo" (it's also the repo_name) > > "portage" doesn't make sense, everything else is too long or > potentially confusing... > >> 1. We have some namespaces in Git: proj, dev, priv, data, sites, >> exp; should the tree be in one of those namespaces, a new >> namespace, or be without a namespace? >> git://anongit.gentoo.org/NEW-NAME.git. > > proj/gentoo would be fine for me (with the same logic as in the > wiki that "Gentoo" is the "main project")
Personally I would find this a bit confusing so I'd prefer a separate namespace or no namespace, if going for a separate namespace it might allow for sub-trees down the road, etc... > > alternatively a separate namespace, but how to name it? maybe "repos" or "tree"? - -- Kristian Fiskerstrand Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVBLhoAAoJEP7VAChXwav6afUH/Ao6oxTeZuKN4x5xYlBOTwOL gWhnHW7yhQ41toi13EAQn8WtKSJdtJIuz81MxXL0AnUFfdspjOZBRfExgkoIUrto EsOAEcrmucPJmO4S2k8WQmg1aFwd9EXzG+Raw8x5x5jQONmufCxI/g6H2RgULqfm F3XKtc2+a3lHWtfmqcmEq7nsS5QBD7HXdN2CBaHkk3J6p0pJ1B6qSkVT8FdBhuJT Q4WHlvvHxg69Ungc9RIGDWp9dDQFpo68zG/A8jXCw4bUgX3zLlE/QOVNAFSsEYOT Gdxr5kEarOedZdIeLfF0OAQIbaeYSkclarO4F4E3BXFgHfA+bm5KwDnhgaFUqQ0= =TRCu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
