Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Calling it "gentoo" makes sense, because the entire tree is what makes > gentoo.
Exactly. And the repo already has this name set in repo_name. > But since it's namespaced in ebuilds/ and because ebuilds/ > might have other gentoo-official repos too, then perhaps "gentoo-main" > makes more sense. If ebuilds/ only has gentoo-official repos then leading "gentoo-" is repetitive and redundant, and unlike "gentoo" simply "main" is a horrible name. //Peter
