Sebastian Pipping posted on Thu, 26 Mar 2015 19:15:09 +0100 as excerpted: > Changes: > > * Revision bump
This ^^.. > * Add section on .php.inc > > * Add thanks line > > > ================================================================ > Title: Apache AddHandler vulnerability protection > Author: Sebastian Pipping <sp...@gentoo.org> > Content-Type: text/plain > Posted: 2015-03-26 > Revision: 2 And this ^^.. > News-Item-Format: 1.0 > Display-If-Installed: www-servers/apache This is a common error. While not entirely intuitive, AFAIK revision is a post-publication value and should remain revision 1 unless a correction is needed once published. Perhaps it is time to formally change that. Reading software must be prepared to deal with first-seen values greater than 1 in any case, since a user might not have seen the original revision, and history has repeatedly demonstrated that people want to bump the revision number during initial discussion. So why not simply let it be bumped, and let the first published version be what it may? If necessary, further bumps can happen from there. Tho in practice, very likely as a result of the pre-publishing approval process including discussion here, AFAIK no such post-publishing correcting revision has ever been necessary. But that's not to say it won't /ever/ be necessary, so having the ability is certainly a good thing. =:^) Either that or start out with a pre-publishing version of 0.1 and bump that, changing it to 1 on initial publish. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
