On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 12:13:32 +0200 Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > <app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-jna-20140508-r1 > > Why do we need to keep app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-jna-20140508-r1 to > simply end up rdepending on > >=virtual/libffi-3.0.13-r1[abi_x86_32(-)] ? Also, no package in the > >tree rdepends on this emul set and, then, > packages outside portage could simply rdepend on libffi directly > instead of needing to keep this Michał, as already discussed with Pacho [1], emul-linux-x86-jna can just go away entirely. Nothing requires it and it doesn't make any sense without emul-linux-x86-java though I note that isn't in the list either; I thought it would be. Java herd is struggling with the regular VM packages enough as it is, we could really do without supporting this one as well. I very much doubt that end users need it any more. Any objections to removing it? [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=474464#c5 -- James Le Cuirot (chewi) Gentoo Linux Developer
pgpoHyxHdr55C.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
